NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Hi-Fi Sydney Pty Ltd (Administrator Appointed) [2015] NSWSC 1312 Hearing dates: 22 June 2015 Date of orders: 29 June 2015 Decision date: 29 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Relief against forfeiture granted; no order as to costs. Catchwords: EQUITY – equitable remedies – relief against forfeiture – relief under (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919, s 129 – whether s 129 applies – where lease provides for termination upon appointment of administrator – whether appointment of administrator constituted breach of lease – held, s 129 applies – whether relief available – relevance of general law considerations to statutory power to grant relief – primary purpose of agreement – where provisions of lease designed to relieve lessor of insolvent tenant – where tenant able to meet payments – where tenant company no longer insolvent – where no damage sustained to lessor by breach of lease – where lessee would suffer loss of fit-out and establishment expenditure – whether grant of relief would resurrect non-party's obligations as guarantor – whether lessee would be in breach of other obligations under lease upon reinstatement warranting forfeiture.
CORPORATIONS – relief against forfeiture – orders preventing lessor from taking possession of premises under (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 444F – whether taking possession by lessor would have material adverse impact on deed of company administration – whether lessor's interests can be adequately protected – lessor's interests qua lessor under lease only relevant interests to be protected.
PROCEDURE – costs – where relief against forfeiture granted – whether opposition to grant of relief necessary – where costs borne out of opposition to grant of relief – where relief also sought in relation to breaches to which lessor had no obligation to consent – held, no order as to costs. Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 436C, s 439A, s 440B, s 444F(2), s 444F(4), s 444F(5), Pt 5.3A (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919, s 129(1), s 129(2) Cases Cited: Ace Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Postal Corporation [2011] 1 Qd R 504; [2010] QCA 55 Bland v Ingram's Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088; [2002] Ch 177; [2002] 1 All ER 244; [2002] 2 WLR 361 Cadogan Estates Ltd v McMahon [2001] 1 AC 378; [2000] 4 All ER 897 Della Imports Pty Ltd v Birkenhead Investments Pty Ltd (1987) NSW ConvR 55-358; [1987] ANZ ConvR 294 Halliard Property Co Limited v Jack Segal Ltd [1978] 1 All ER 1219; [1978] 1 WLR 377 Lindholm Re Munday Group Pty Ltd (recrs and mgrs. Apptd) (in liq) v Tsourlinis Distributors Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 195 Melacare International Ltd (in receivership) v Daley Investments Pty Ltd (1999) 9 BPR 17,095; [1999] NSWSC 496 Mineaplenty Pty Ltd v Trek 31 Pty Ltd (2006) 17 BPR 32,645; (2007) ANZ ConvR 123; [2006] NSWSC 1203 Pioneer Gravels (Qld) Pty Ltd v T & T Mining Corporation Pty Ltd [1975] Qd R 151 Pioneer Quarries (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Permanent Trustee Coy of NSW Limited (1970) 2 BPR 9,562 Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding [1973] 1 All ER 90; [1973] 2 WLR 28; [1973] AC 691 Strazdins Re DNPW Pty Ltd v Birch Carroll & Coyle Ltd (2009) 178 FCR 300; (2009) 72 ACSR 563; [2009] FCA 731 Tutita Pty Ltd v Ryleaco Pty Ltd (1989) 4 BPR 9,635; (1989) NSW ConvR 55-486 Wynsix Hotels (Oxford Street) Pty Ltd v Toomey (2004) 17 BPR 32,633; [2004] NSWSC 336 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Carsingha Investments Pty Limited (ACN 169 790 523) (plaintiff/respondent) Hi-Fi Sydney Pty Ltd (administrator appointed) (ACN 136 479 895) (first defendant/first applicant) Simon Patrick Nelson (second defendant/second applicant) Karamika Pty Ltd (ACN 006 636 997) (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Sulan w R May (plaintiff/respondent) G Sirtes SC w J Shepard (first and second defendants/applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate