NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shamoun v R [2015] NSWCCA 246 Hearing dates: 28 April 2015 Decision date: 11 September 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Hall J at [153] McCallum J at [287] Decision: (1)In relation to the conviction appeal, leave to appeal granted but the appeal is dismissed. (2)In relation to the sentence appeal, leave to appeal granted but the appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CONVICTION APPEAL – offences of murder and malicious wounding – whether verdict unreasonable and not supported by the evidence – need for the Court to make its own assessment of the sufficiency and quality of the evidence – assessment of witnesses essentially a jury question – open to jury to find beyond reasonable doubt that applicant guilty – whether direction as to circumstantial evidence misleading – whether direction as to how evidence of co-accused should be considered by the jury was adequate – no error disclosed – conviction appeal dismissed. SENTENCE APPEAL – whether applicant's medical condition properly taken into account – whether applicant's cognitive impairment properly taken into account – whether finding of special circumstances should have been made – whether sentence was manifestly excessive – grounds not made out – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – s 44(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) - s 6(1) Evidence Act 1995 – s 165, s 128 Cases Cited: Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7 Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 Dinsdale v R [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Hawi v R [2014] NSWCCA 83 Jiang v R [2010] NSWCCA 277 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 MacKenzie v R [1996] HCA 35; 190 CLR 348 Mansaray v R [2015] NSWCCA 40 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Power v R [1974] HCA 26; 131 CLR 623 R v Clark [2009] NSWCCA 49 R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Fadi Shamoun [2012] NSWSC 716 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Hillier [2007] HCA 13; 228 CLR 618 R v MD [2015] NSWCCA 37 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Trad v R [2009] NSWCCA 56; 194 A Crim R 20 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44; 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fadi Shamoun – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr AJ Bellanto QC/Mr C Moschoudis – Applicant Ms S Dowling SC – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate