NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Polley v R [2015] NSWCCA 247 Hearing dates: 28 July 2015 Decision date: 11 September 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Price J at [53] Fagan J at [54] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCE APPEAL – two offences of supplying a prohibited drug – pleas of guilty – MDMA and methylamphetamine – finding of drug trafficking "to a substantial degree" – strong subjective case – good prospects of rehabilitation – nevertheless custodial sentence inevitable – whether applicant's strong subjective case properly taken into account – whether strong subjective case amounted to "exceptional circumstances" – whether sentence manifestly excessive – circumstances of offending required that effect be given to general deterrence – applicant's strong subjective case did not amount to exceptional circumstances – proper exercise of sentencing discretion – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 – s 25(1) Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 Cases Cited: Bland v R [2014] NSWCCA 82 House v R [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 R v Cacciola [1998] NSWSC 531; 104 A Crim R 178 R v Cahill [2015] NSWCCA 53 R v Clark (NSWCCA, unreported, 5.3.1990) R v Carrion [2000] NSWCCA 191; 49 NSWLR 149 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 Regina v Saba [2006] NSWCCA 214 Richardson v R [2013] NSWCCA 218 Smaragdis v R [2010] NSWCCA 276 Wong v R [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Yang v R [2012] NSWCCA 49; 219 A Crim R 550 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Polley – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: I Lloyd QC/R Webb – Applicant Ms N Adams SC/M Rabsch – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate