NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Idameneo (No 123) Pty Ltd v Auzcare Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1318 Hearing dates: 5 February 2015 Date of orders: 09 September 2015 Decision date: 09 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hidden J Decision: Relevant clauses of settlement deed not a penalty. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEEDINGS – separate question whether clauses in a settlement deed in respect of proceedings for damages amount to a penalty – acknowledgement of debt. Cases Cited: Attwells v Marsden [2011] NSWSC 38 Barnes v Addy (1874) 9 Ch. App. Cas. 244 Calcorp (Australia) Pty Ltd v 271 Collins Pty Ltd [2010] VSCA 259, 29 VR 462 Cameron v UBS AG [2000] VSCA 222, [2000] 2 VR 108 O'Dea v Allstates Leasing System (WA) Pty Ltd (1982-83) 152 CLR 359 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Aspley Specialist Centre Pty Ltd [2010] QSC 232 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Mitchell [2010] NSWSC 825 Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 71, 224 CLR 656 Zenith Engineering Pty Ltd v Queensland Crane and Machinery Pty Ltd [2000] QCA 221, [2001] 2 QdR 114 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Idameneo (No 123) Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Auzcare Pty Ltd (1st defendant) Dr Muhammad Azam (2nd defendant) Mrs Imrana Azam (3rd defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Lucarelli (plaintiff) J Hyde Page (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate