NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dreger v Rural Valuations Pty Limited and O'Dea [2015] NSWSC 1338 Hearing dates: 11 September 2015 Date of orders: 11 September 2015 Decision date: 11 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: 1. Judgment is entered in favour of the plaintiff against the first and second defendants in the sum of $236,250.00. 2. The first and second defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – Professional negligence - Misleading and deceptive conduct – Valuation of properties provided by first defendant and prepared by second defendant – Where plaintiff relied upon the valuation to advance funds to be secured by mortgage – Where default in the loan agreement – Where the valuation was outside the range which could properly have been arrived at by a competent valuer – Causes of action made out – Damages awarded in favour of the plaintiff Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Cases Cited: Adwell Holdings Pty Limited v Smith [2003] NSWCA 103 Hann Nominees Pty Limited v National Australia Bank Ltd [2000] FCA 454 Kenny and Good Pty Limited v MGICA [1999] HCA 25; (1999) 199 CLR 413 Merivale Moore Plc v Strutt & Parker [1999] 2 EGLR 171 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marion Dorothy Dreger - Plaintiff Rural Valuations – First defendant Anthony Richard O'Dea – Second defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr S Bell - Plaintiff No appearance - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate