NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chow v Chow (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1348 Hearing dates: 1 September 2015 Date of orders: 18 September 2015 Decision date: 18 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Young AJA Decision: Costs of all parties be paid out of the proceeds of sale Catchwords: COSTS – application for sale under s66G of Conveyancing Act 1919 – whether 'usual order' for all costs out of proceeds appropriate – significance of conduct by one party causing delay COSTS – proceedings commenced May 2015 – negotiations 2011-2015 producing substantial costs – whether such costs to be costs of the proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act, 2005 (NSW) Supreme Court Act, 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Barel v Segal (No 3) [2012] NSWSC 1319 Botros v Frank [2013] NSWSC 712 Edwards v Santos Ltd [2011] HCA 8; 242 CLR 421 Kardos v Sarbutt (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 206 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; 239 CLR 531 McIntyre v Perkes (1988) 15 NSWLR 417 Re Gibson's Settlement Trusts [1981] Ch 179 Perpetual Executors & Trustees Association of Australia Ltd v Colonial Mutual Fire Insurance Company Ltd (1903) 29 VLR 427 Tasleen v Beverley [2014] 1 WLR 3567 TF v Department of Family & Community Services [2015] NSWSC 694 Thomson v Sweeney [2013] NSWSC 1383 Texts Cited: Law of Costs, Professor Dal Pont (Lexisnexis, Butterworth, 2013) Category: Costs Parties: Chow Kwok Chi - plaintiff Chow Kwok Chuen – first defendant Chow Kwok Ching – second defendant Jack Thomas – third defendant (submitting appearance) Representation: Counsel: P H Blackburn-Hart SC with Ms D Tucker – for the plaintiff S O'Brien – for the first defendant M Walton SC with M W Sneddon – for the second defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate