NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Robertson v R [2015] NSWCCA 251 Hearing dates: 11 September 2015 Decision date: 11 September 2015 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Adams J at [30]; R A Hulme J at [31] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal.
(2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – sentencing – manslaughter – use of comparable cases – relevance to determining manifest excess – whether concept of "available range" useful – whether cases not relied on before sentencing judge can be relied on for purposes of appeal
CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – manslaughter – reliance on violence as aggravating factor – whether violence an element of offence – possible double counting – Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A(2) Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Barnes v R [2014] NSWCCA 224 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; 243 FLR 28; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Elyard v R [2006] NSWCCA 43; 45 MVR 402 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Ibrahim v R [2009] NSWCCA 15 Shedden v R [2013] NSWCCA 225 Zreika v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 44; 223 A Crim R 460 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Darren Stewart Robertson (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms C Loukas SC (Applicant) Ms G O'Rourke (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate