NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Perera v Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Ltd t/a Genworth [2015] NSWSC 1357 Hearing dates: 11 September 2015 Date of orders: 18 September 2015 Decision date: 18 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Leave not granted to the Plaintiff to file his proposed Amended Statement of Claim. Plaintiff's Statement of Claim struck out. Plaintiff ordered to pay Defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application to strike out statement of claim – application to oppose filing of amended statement of claim – whether pleadings disclosed any cause of action – duty of care not to cause pure economic loss – duty of care not to negligently inflict nervous shock – whether potential plaintiff may owe duties to potential defendant and associated entities not to commence proceedings negligently – defamation – requirement to plead allegedly defamatory imputation – requirement to give particulars of identification of the plaintiff. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 13.41A, 14.28(1)(a) and (b) Cases Cited: Beach Club Port Douglas P/L v Page (2005) 1 Qd R 307 Business Computers International Ltd v Registrar of Companies [1988] Ch 229 Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 Cabassi v Vila (1940) 64 CLR 130 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victorian Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1 Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Ltd v Hodder Rook & Associates Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1043 Hodder Rook & Associates Pty Ltd v Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 279 Jain v Trent Stategic Health Authority [2009] 1 AC 853 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1 Laferla v Birdon Sands Pty Ltd (2005) Aust Tort Reports 81-876 Moorabool Shire Council v Taitapanui (2006) 14 VR 55 Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Plaintiff: Madura Perera Defendant: Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Ltd trading as Genworth Representation: Counsel: Defendant: E. Holmes
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate