NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Beatrice McCleary v Metlik Investments Pty Limited; Beatrice McCleary v Benedict Chan;; Clement Chan v Benedict Chan (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1361 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 16 September 2015 Decision date: 16 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Apart from certain costs incurred in relation to one of the Succession Act claims, the unsuccessful plaintiffs are ordered to pay the costs of the successful defendants. Catchwords: COSTS – departing from general rule that costs follow the event – application for family provision order – property transferred to claimant after commencement of proceedings – had transfer not occurred claimant would have succeeded in obtaining order for family provision – order that claimant pay costs of defendant incurred after the transfer Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 99 Cases Cited: Harkness v Harkness (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 35 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Singer v Berghouse (1993) 114 ALR 521 Category: Costs Parties: 2013/359456 Beatrice Sit King McCleary (plaintiff) Metlik Investments Pty Ltd (defendant)
2012/29419 Beatrice Sit King McCleary (first plaintiff) Agnes Yim King Kwan (second plaintiff) Benedict Aloysius Wai Nam Chan (defendant)
2013/187391 Clement Wai Shing Chan (plaintiff) Benedict Aloysius Wai Nam Chan (defendant) Representation: Counsel: M S Willmott SC and D Liebhold (plaintiffs) M Gorrick (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate