NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Paratei Pty Ltd v ING Bank (Australia) Limited; Sparks v Battaglia [2015] NSWSC 1368 Hearing dates: 24 and 25 November 2014, 13, 14, 15 and 16 July 2015 Date of orders: 17 September 2015 Decision date: 17 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Cross claims by guarantors and mortgagors dismissed. Orders to be made for possession of mortgaged properties. Judgments to be entered against guarantors and mortgagors. Catchwords: EQUITY – unconscionable conduct – guarantees and mortgages given by shareholders in support of debts of companies – whether special disability by reason of lack of involvement in management of companies and lack of knowledge or explanation of transactions – some of guarantees and mortgages executed under power of attorney – whether unconscionable of lender to enforce guarantees and mortgages
BANKING AND FINANCE – unconscionable conduct in connection with financial services – guarantees and mortgages given by shareholders in support of debts of companies – whether conduct of lender unconscionable in circumstances due to lack of knowledge or explanation of transactions – some of guarantees and mortgages executed under power of attorney – Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), s 12CB
CONTRACTS – unjust contracts – guarantees and mortgages given by shareholders in support of debts of companies – whether contracts unjust in circumstances due to lack of knowledge or explanation of transactions – some of guarantees and mortgages executed under power of attorney – Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW), ss 7,9 Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) ss 7, 9 Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 12CB Cases Cited: Bakarich v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2007] NSWCA 169; Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99CLR 362; Canty v Paperlinx Australia Pty Limited [2014] NSWCA 309; Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447; Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 392; [2013] HCA 25; Provident Capital Limited v Papa (2013) 84 NSWLR 231; [2013] NSWCA 36; Spina v Permanent Custodians Limited [2009] NSWCA 206; Taheri v Vitek [2014] NSWCA 209; Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389 West v AGC (Advances) Limited (1986) 5 NSWLR 610; Category: Principal judgment Parties: 2013/231527 ING Bank (Australia) Limited (first cross claimant/defendant to second cross claim) Florentina and Stefano Battaglia (sixth and seventh cross defendants; second cross claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate