NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Attorney General of New South Wales v Martin [2015] NSWSC 1372 Hearing dates: 17 February 2015; 18 February 2015; 19 February 2015; final submissions: 17 June 2015; 7 July 2015 Decision date: 17 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Simpson J Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 8(7)(a) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), all of the proceedings in New South Wales already instituted by the defendant be stayed;
(2) Pursuant to s 8(7)(b) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008, the defendant be prohibited from instituting proceedings in New South Wales without leave of the Court. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 8(1)(a) and (b) - whether defendant has "frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings in Australia" - whether defendant's prior claims constitute "vexatious proceedings", s 6 - discretion to make orders - defendant instituted and conducted vexatious proceedings frequently and over considerable period of time - orders granted
PROCEDURE - "dual role" of Attorney General under s 8(4) Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) whether Attorney General should be precluded from seeking orders from which the NSW government would benefit - role analogous to any litigant under s 8(4)(d) - role of Attorney General to prevent unwarranted disruption to justice system
EVIDENCE - admissibility - exclusion of evidence of judgments and convictions - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 91 - whether judgments admissible as proof of facts in issue - Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 8) [2014] NSWCA 125 - Attorney General v Chan [2011] NSWSC 1315 - factual findings in judgment not capable of establishing existence of relevant facts for s 6 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) - decision maker must make independent judgment on nature of prior proceedings - s 91 antithetical to object of Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 91, 190, 192 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) 13.4, 14.28, 36.15 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 4, 6, 8 Cases Cited: Anthony Gilbert Martin v Insurance Australia Ltd [2005] ACTCA 17 Anthony Gilbert Martin v NRMA Insurance Ltd [1998] ACTSC 237 Anthony Gilbert Martin, Sue Dolores Martin and Individual Homes Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1994] ACTSC 64 Attorney General in and for the State of NSW v Gargan [2010] NSWSC 1192 Attorney General in and for the State of NSW v Markisic [2014] NSWSC 1596 Attorney General in and for the State of NSW v Potier [2014] NSWSC 118 Attorney General of New South Wales v Anthony Gilbert Martin [2013] NSWSC 442 Attorney General of New South Wales v Croker [2010] NSWSC 942 Attorney General v Bar-Mordecai [2005] NSWSC 142 Attorney General v Chan [2011] NSWSC 1315 Attorney General v Wilson [2010] NSWSC 1008 Martin v Attorney General for the State of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 189 Martin v Individual Homes Pty Ltd (In liq) [2001] FCA 91 Martin v Minister for Mineral and Forest Resources [2011] NSWLEC 1011 Martin v NSW Department of Industry and Investment [2009] NSWLEC 1447 Martin v NSW Minister for Mineral and Forest Resources [2010] NSWLEC 131 Martin v State of NSW (No 14) [2012] NSWCA 46 Martin v State of NSW (No 15) [2012] NSWCA 47 Martin v State of NSW (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 108 Martin v State of NSW (No 9) [2011] NSWCA 286 Martin v State of NSW [2010] NSWLEC 247 Martin v State of NSW [2011] NSWCA 281 Martin v State of NSW [2011] NSWLEC 126 Martin v State of NSW [2011] NSWLEC 129 Martin v State of NSW [2011] NSWLEC 20 Martin v State of NSW [2015] NSWCA 141 Martin v State of NSW and Central West Scientific Pty Ltd [2011] NSWLEC 50 Re Martin's Application [2001] HCA 41; 180 ALR 453 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 8) [2014] NSWCA 125 Viavattene v Attorney General (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Anthony Gilbert Martin (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: V McWilliam (Plaintiff) In person (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate