NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Yoo v Kang; Kang v Yoo [2014] NSWLC 29 Hearing dates: 2 and 9 September 2013; 11 November 2013; and 6 February 2014 Decision date: 30 April 2014 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Favretto LCM Decision: 1. The Statement of Claim is granted and a verdict entered for the Plaintiff in the sum of $50,000; 2. Interest under s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 from 17 November 2006 to 31 August 2012; 3. The Cross-Claim is dismissed; and 4. Costs to the Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant on an ordinary basis as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEEDINGS – contract – sale of restaurant - whether sale agreement a concluded contract – whether conditions of sale agreement complied with Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 100 Cases Cited: Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407; 76 NSWLR 603 Malago Pty Ltd v AW Ellis Engineering Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 227 Masters v Cameron [1954] HCA 72; 91 CLR 353 Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas [2004] HCA 35; 218 CLR 451 Sagacious Procurement Pty Ltd v Symbion Health Ltd (formerly Mayne Group Ltd) [2008] NSWCA 149 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52; 219 CLR 165 Texts Cited: J W Carter, Carter on Contract (LexisNexis online version as at 1 September 2013) Category: Principal judgment Parties: S W Yoo (plaintiff/cross-defendant) P K Kang (defendant/cross-claimant) Representation: Counsel: T Bland (for the plaintiff/cross-defendant) A Chee (for the defendant/cross-claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate