NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: The Federal Capital Press of Australia Pty Ltd v Balzola [2015] NSWCA 285 Hearing dates: 10 September 2015 Decision date: 22 September 2015 Before: Emmett JA, Sackville AJA Decision: 1. Leave to appeal refused. 2. Applicants to pay respondent's costs of the application for leave to appeal. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – primary judge granted leave for the plaintiff to amend statement of claim to plead back contextual imputations and subsequently defendants contextual imputations struck out - application for leave to appeal from interlocutory decision - whether application gives rise to an issue of principle or injustice if refused – application for leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 25, 26 Cases Cited: Balzola v Federal Capital Press of Australia Pty Ltd [2015] NSWDC 23 Balzola v Federal Capital Press of Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) (District Court, Gibson DCJ, 27 August 2015, unrep) Born Brands Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 369 Dank v Cronulla Sutherland District Rugby League Football club Ltd [2014] NSWCA 288 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited v Kermode [2011] NSWCA 174; 81 NSWLR 157 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Federal Capital Press of Australia Pty Limited (First Applicant) Lisa Cox (Second Applicant) Robert Balzola (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr TD Blackburn SC / Ms L Barnett (Applicants) Mr R Rasmussen (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate