NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cornish v R [2015] NSWCCA 256 Hearing dates: 24 July 2015 Decision date: 24 September 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Hall J at [2] Button J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – drug and firearms offences – aggregate sentence imposed – whether sentencing judge failed to assess adequately the objective seriousness of the offences – whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to give sufficient weight to the applicant's schizophrenia – whether the sentence was manifestly excessive – leave to appeal granted – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 193C(1), 556A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 10A, Div 1A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 166 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 10(1), 23(1)(a), 25(1), 29, Sch 1 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 7(1), 51D(2), 65(3) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 571 Carroll v The Queen [2009] HCA 13; (2009) 83 ALJR 579 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matthew Cornish (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Russell (Applicant) M Cinque (Respondent)
Solicitors: P M Murphy (Applicant) C Hyland – Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/295015 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Date of Decision: 23 May 2014 Before: Walmsley SC ADCJ File Number(s): 2013/295015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate