NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 1399 Hearing dates: 18 September 2015 Date of orders: 23 September 2015 Decision date: 23 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Leave to amend the defence is refused. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defences – late application to amend – whether in accordance with dictates of justice to allow amendment Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58, 64 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 3, 26, 30 Cases Cited: Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 162 Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1010 Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1344 Hayson v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited [2007] NSWCA 376 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Sean Carolan (plaintiff) Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (first defendant) Peter FitzSimons (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Smark SC with S Chrysanthou (plaintiff) ATS Dawson with C Amato (defendants)
Solicitors: Kalantzis Lawyers (plaintiff) Bank Haddock Fiora (defendants) File Number(s): 2014/245957 Publication restriction: None
Judgment 1. HER HONOUR: This is an action for defamation arising out of the publication of a series of articles in the Sydney Morning Herald. This judgment determines a contested application by the defendants for leave to amend their defence.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate