NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: NuCoal Resources Limited v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2015] NSWSC 1400 Hearing dates: 27 October 2014 Date of orders: 24 September 2015 Decision date: 24 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Summons dismissed;
(2) The plaintiff shall pay the costs of and incidental to the defendant;
(3) The parties are at liberty to apply for any special order as to costs. Such application may be made by a submission of no more than 3 pages and is to be filed within 7 days of the date of this judgment. Any other party affected by any application for a different or special order for costs may respond to such submission within a further 7 days. The issue will be dealt with on the basis of the submissions filed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – Independent Commission against Corruption Act 1998 s 73(2) – whether Commission failed to investigate fully in making recommendation Legislation Cited: Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 Mining Amendment (ICAC Operations Jasper and Acacia) Act 2014 Cases Cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21; (1990) 170 CLR 1 Beale v Government Insurance Office (NSW) (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Craig v State of South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163 D'Amore v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2013] NSWCA 187 Independent Commission Against Corruption v Cunneen [2015] HCA 14; (2015) 89 ALJR 475 Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332 Public Service Association (SA) v Federated Clerks' Union of Australia [1991] HCA 33; (1991) 173 CLR 132 Swift v SAS Trustee Corporation [2010] NSWCA 182 Category: Principal judgment Parties: NuCoal Resources NL (Plaintiff) Independent Commission Against Corruption (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: N Williams/with J. Hoyle (Plaintiff) G. Watson SC/ with J. Emmett (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate