NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Micaul Holdings Pty Limited v Randwick City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1386 Hearing dates: 12-14 August 2015 Date of orders: 25 August 2015 Decision date: 25 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal upheld Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: residential flat building; whether objection to development standards for building height and floor space ratio are well founded; compliance with planning controls; impact on adjoining properties; adequacy of solar access; Legislation Cited: Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012; 28 State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP55); State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat Development (SEPP65); State Environmental Planning Policy (Building and Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 (SEPP BASIX); State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009; Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Texts Cited: Randwick Development Control Plan 2013; Residential Flat Design Code Category: Principal judgment Parties: Micaul Holdings Pty Limited (Applicant) Randwick City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I Hemmings SC (Applicant) Mr J Robson SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Mr G Christmas, Apex Law (Applicant) Ms V McGrath, Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondent) File Number(s): 10170 of 2015
Judgment 1. Micaul Holdings Pty Limited lodged Development Application 11/2015 with Randwick City Council on 12 January 2015 seeking consent to demolish existing buildings and construct a residential flat building at 293-297 Alison Road, Coogee. 2. The council had not determined the application within the prescribed period and Micaul is appealing its deemed refusal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate