NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kentish v Maurer & anor [2015] NSWLEC 1393 Hearing dates: 23 September 2015 Date of orders: 23 September 2015 Decision date: 23 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Galwey AC Decision: The application is upheld. See orders at paragraph 18. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS); damage; injury; debris; orders for tree pruning. Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Cases Cited: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292 Freeman v Dillon [2012] NSWLEC 1057 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Kentish (Applicant) Kasey Maurer (First Respondent) Glenn Davis (Second Respondent) Representation: Paul Kentish, litigant in person (Applicant) Kasey Maurer and Glenn Davis, litigants in person (Respondents) File Number(s): 20602 of 2015
Judgment
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
Background 1. Mr Kentish ('the applicant') has applied to the Land and Environment Court under Part 2 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 ('the Trees Act') seeking orders for the removal of two trees within a neighbouring property, on the grounds that they may cause damage or injury, and because they drop debris such as leaves and twigs onto his property. 2. In his application Mr Kentish sought the removal of one of these trees also for the reason that it obstructs views from his dwelling, under Part 2A of the Trees Act. When I explained that Part 2A only applies to trees that form a hedge, and he did not think that the neighbouring trees formed a hedge, he did not wish to press that part of the application. 3. Mr Kentish provided photographs to demonstrate that the two trees were not present when his dwelling was constructed in 1984. 4. Ms Maurer and Mr Davis ('the respondents') did not plant the trees, which were already established when they purchased their property five years ago. They have offered to prune the trees but do not wish to remove them.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate