NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v Johnson [2015] NSWCA 297 Hearing dates: 26 August 2015 Decision date: 30 September 2015 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Ward JA at [2]; Sackville AJA at [6] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed 2. Set aside Orders 1 and 1A made by Kunc J on 9 December 2014. 3. In lieu of Orders 1 and 1A, order that the Plaintiff's summons be dismissed. 4. The respondent pay the appellant's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision order – adult child (claimant) claims further provision from moderately substantial estate of his mother – claimant dependent on parents – two siblings relatively well off - interim distribution under will offset against costs owed by the claimant to the estate due to intra-family litigation – whether primary judge erred in finding that claimant's conduct in intra-family litigation did not preclude a family provision order – whether claimant's conduct was malicious or in bad faith - whether the claimant's financial needs included a provision for a two bedroom apartment – whether primary Judge's discretion miscarried Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 57, 59, 60; Ch 3, Pt 3.2 Cases Cited: Andrew v Andrew [2012] NSWCA 308; 81 NSWLR 656 Bates v Cook [2015] NSWCA 278 Bowditch v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2012] NSWSC 275 Burke v Burke [2015] NSWCA 195 Chapple v Wilcox [2014] NSWCA 392; 87 NSWLR 646 Johnson by her tutor Karen Smith v Johnson [2009] NSWSC 503 Johnson v NSW Guardianship Tribunal [2009] NSWSC 664 Johnson v Smith [2010] NSWCA 306 Johnson v Smith [2010] NSWSC 125 Johnson v Smith [2011] HCASL 53 Johnson v Smith [2014] NSWSC 1682 Mulcahy v Weldon [2002] NSWCA 206 Re Will of Jane (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 883 Re Will of Jane [2011] NSWSC 624 Smith v Johnson [2008] NSWSC 923 Underwood v Gaudron [2015] NSWCA 269 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Karen Elisabeth Smith (First Appellant) David Charles Johnson (Second Appellant) Andrew Robert Stuart Johnson (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Ellison SC / Ms H Bennett (First and Second Appellants) CM Lawrence (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate