NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Manners (Preliminary) [2015] NSWSC 1420 Hearing dates: 28 September 2015 Decision date: 28 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Interim supervision order for 28 days with two qualified psychiatrists appointed to conduct separate psychiatric examinations of the defendant Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 – high risk sex offender - preliminary hearing – application for appointment of two psychiatrists to examine the defendant – application for interim supervision order pending the final hearing –– whether the matters alleged in the supporting documentation would, if proved, justify the making of an extended supervision order – where defendant has lengthy history of sexual offending against children – defendant diagnosed with paedophilic disorder and paraphilia – where defendant does not oppose orders sought – court satisfied that relevant statutory criteria satisfied – orders sought made Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General for the State of NSW v Hayter [2007] NSWSC 983 State of New South Wales v Manners [2008] NSWSC 1242 The State of New South Wales v Manners [2008] NSWSC 1376 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Andrew Robert Manners (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Emmett (Plaintiff) Mr P Skinner (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate