NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Ahmad [2015] NSWCATOD 103 Hearing dates: 31 August, 1, 2, 3, 4 September 2015 Date of orders: 29 September 2015 Decision date: 29 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: J Millbank, Presiding Member E Frost, Pharmacy Member R Benda, Pharmacy Member J Klause, Lay Member Decision: 1. The practitioner, Tareq Ahmad, is reprimanded under s 149A(1)(a) of the National Law; 2. The practitioner's registration as a Pharmacist on the National Register of Health Practitioners maintained by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency is cancelled from the date of this order pursuant to s149C(1)(b); 3. Pursuant to s 149C(7) the practitioner may not make an application under Division 8 to return to the register until at least 2 years from the date of this order; 4. The practitioner is prohibited, pursuant to s149C(5)(a), from providing any pharmaceutical services (including as a pharmacy assistant or dispensary assistant) until such time as he is re-registered as a pharmacist; 5. A non publication order under s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) prohibiting the publication of the names of the Patients A, C-H in the amended schedule to the complaint, and any other patient named in the course of proceedings; 6. A certificate is granted under s 128(3)(b) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) providing that the evidence of Mr Ahmad in this proceeding cannot be used against him in other proceedings; 7. Costs in favour of the Commission pursuant to cl 13(1) of Sch 5D of the National law as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: Pharmacy; false dispensing entries; false drug register entries; fabrication of prescriber and patient identities; failure to keep prescriptions; supply of Sch 4, Sch 4D and Sch 8 medications without prescriptions; failure to enter supply in drug register of Sch 8 medications; failure to enter correctly enter receipt of Sch 8 medications in drug register; failure to notify Director-General of loss of Sch 4 and Sch 8 substances; failure to keep key to Sch 8 drugs safe on his person. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) ('CAT') s 64; Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 128; Health Practitioner Regulation National Law 2009 (NSW) ('The National Law') s 139B; s 139D(1)(d); s 139E; s 149C(5); Sch 5F, cl 11 (1); Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 (NSW); Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Regulation 2008 (NSW) ('PTGR') cl 39; cl 67; cl 76; cl 85; cl 86; cl 89; cl 112; cl 177(1); cl 124. Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34, (1983) 60 CLR 336; Gianoutsos v Glykis [2006] NSWCCA 137, (2006) 65 NSWLR 539; In re Sood [2006] NSWMT 1; Polglaze v Veterinary Practitioners Board of NSW [2009] NSWSC 347; HCCC v Fraser [2014] NSWCATOD 29; HCCC v Do [2014] NSWCA 307; Stanoevski v Law Society of New South Wales [2008] NSWCA 93; HCCC v Jamieson [2014] NSWCATOD 56; HCCC v Della Bruna [2014] NSWCATOD 31; Pillai v Messiter (No 2) (1989) 16 NSWLR 197; HCCC v Perroux [2011] NSWDC 99; HCCC v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 630; Sabag v HCCC [2001] NSWCA 411; Lucire v HCCC [2011] NSWCA 182; Spicer v NSW Medical Council unreported CA No 3 of 1981 (19 February 1981). Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Complainant) Tareq Ahmad (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Hunt (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate