NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fitzgerald v R [2015] NSWCCA 266 Hearing dates: 24 September 2015 Decision date: 09 October 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Price J at [53] Button J at [54] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – four counts of possessing child abuse material and two counts of using a carriage service to access child pornography – over 1,145 items including 390 videos – 700 - 800 child victims – 25 percent of items in the most serious category – challenge to assessment of objective seriousness by sentencing judge – whether sentence was manifestly excessive – analysis of similar cases – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 91H(2) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – s 16A, s 28(1)(b) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – s 21A Commonwealth Criminal Code – s 474.19(1)(a)(i) Cases Cited: House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Martin v Regina [2014] NSWCCA 124 Mulato v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Booth [2009] NSWCCA 89 R v De Leeuw [2015] NSWCCA 183 R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370; 162 A Crim R 29 R v Lee [2013] WASCA 216 R v Linardon [2014] NSWCCA 247 R v Martin [2014] NSWCCA 283 R v Minehan [2010] NSWCCA 140; 201 A Crim R 243 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matthew Fitzgerald – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: JJ Tunks – Applicant P McGuire – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate