NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fesus (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1467 Hearing dates: 21, 22 & 23 September 2015 Date of orders: 25 September 2015 Decision date: 25 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wilson J Decision: 1. The recordings and evidence [REDACTED] summarised in Ex. VD A is not, of itself, admissible. Should the accused wish to explore the circumstances [REDACTED] relevant questions may be asked of UCO 1 and other participating operatives. Such questions may be directed to any alleged inducements held out to the accused [REDACTED] for the purposes of the undercover operation in 2013. 2. The recording of the meeting between the accused and UCO 6 on 8 July 2013 (Ex. VD CV 42) is admitted. 3. The evidence of the recorded interview between the accused and Detective Senior Constable Sebastian Herft on 8 July 2013 (Ex. VD CV 43) is admitted, save for the following discrete portions (by reference to the transcript, aide memoire to the exhibit): i. Q&A 170 – 174 inclusive; ii. Q&A 184; iii. Q&A 189 – 191 inclusive; iv. Q&A 198 – 205 inclusive; v. Q 259; and vi. A 259 "Well, that was the main one". Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – pre-trail proceedings – voir dire concerning the admissibility of evidence – undercover police operation – admissions made to undercover police operative – question of legality of undercover operation – question of unfairness by police Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 Cases Cited: Dupas v The Queen [2012] VSCA 328; 218 A Crim R 507 Em v The Queen [2007] HCA 46; (2007) 232 CLR 67 Fleming v R [2009] NSWCCA 233 R v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112; 66 NSWLR 228 R v Swaffield; Pavic v The Queen [1998] HCA 1; (1998) 192 CLR 159 Ridgeway v The Queen [1984] HCA 66; (1984) 184 CLR 19 Tofilau, Marks, Hill, Clarke v R [2007] HCA 39; (2007) 231 CLR 396 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Crown Steven Frank Fesus Representation: Counsel: Mr J. Crespo (Crown) Mr M. Finnane QC with Ms Carroll (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate