NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v A2; R v KM; R v Vaziri (No. 8) [2015] NSWSC 1472 Hearing dates: 9, 10 September 2015 Date of orders: 10 September 2015 Decision date: 07 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: A foundation for leave to cross-examine A1 under s.38 Evidence Act 1995 has been demonstrated, with a final ruling as to leave to await the trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application by Crown for advance ruling on application for leave to cross-examine under s.38 Evidence Act 1995 - evidence unfavourable to Crown - prior inconsistent statements made by witness - final ruling to await evidence of witness at trial - discretionary factors under s.192 Evidence Act 1995 to be applied Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Adam v The Queen [2001] HCA 57; 207 CLR 96 Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v McRae [2010] VSC 114 Poniris v R [2014] NSWCCA 100 Potts v R [2012] NSWCCA 229; 227 A Crim R 217 R (Cth) v Petroulias (No. 29) [2007] NSWSC 1005 R v A2; R v KM; R v Vaziri (No. 2) [2015] NSWSC 1221 R v Anyang [2011] VSC 31 R v FDP [2008] NSWCCA 317; 74 NSWLR 645 R v Le [2002] NSWCCA 186; 54 NSWLR 474 Whitehorn v The Queen [1983] HCA 42; 152 CLR 657 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) A2 (Accused) KM (Accused) Shabbir Mohammedbhai Vaziri (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms NL Williams (Crown) Mr RF Sutherland SC (Accused A2 and Vaziri) Mr S Bouveng (Accused KM)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate