NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Plaintiff A & B v Bird; Plaintiff C v Bird [2016] NSWSC 997 Hearing dates: 6 and 7 October 2015 Date of orders: 25 July 2016 Decision date: 25 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: RS Hulme AJ Decision: Applications refused - I order the Plaintiffs pay the Defendant's costs of the applications providing however the Plaintiffs may within 7 days' notice to my Associate apply to discharge this order Catchwords: Evidence Act s192A – hearsay evidence of children – tendency and coincidence Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: TKWJ v The Queen [2002[ HCA 46; 212 CLR 124 Lambert Leasing Inc v QBE Insurance Australia Ltd [2012] NSWSC 953 Beslic v MLC Ltd [2015] NSWSC 908 Maloof v Uncle's Joint Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 389 Sisson v Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC1106 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff A & B (Plaintiff) Plaintiff C (Plaintiff) Rodney Raymond Bird (First Defendant) Lisa Maree Clancy (Second Defendant) Little Pigeon Pty Ltd trading as Footprints Childcare Centre (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Romaniuk SC with Ms M Kumar and Ms N Oreb (Plaintiff) DR Toomey SC with SJ Holmes (First Defendant) Ms PA Horvath with PR Gaffney (Second and Third Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate