NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Roney v Woollahra Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 1405 Hearing dates: 23 September 2015 Date of orders: 07 October 2015 Decision date: 29 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pearson C Decision: See paragraph [37] Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT MODIFICATION – Removal of existing tree – Replacement planting – Demolition of existing retaining walls and construction of kerb and garden bed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995 Cases Cited: Dipper v Pittwater Council [2006] NSWLEC 273 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sara Hess Roney (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Staunton (Applicant)
Solicitors: Mr S Patterson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10404 of 2015
Judgment 1. This is an appeal under s 97AA of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) against the refusal by the respondent Council of an application made under s 96(1A) of the Act to modify development consent DA 534/2011 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house at 3A Buckhurst Ave Point Piper (the site). 2. The modification application seeks approval for the following works: 1.Removal of an existing Magnolia grandiflora (Bull Bay magnolia) located along the southern boundary by the existing driveway directly opposite the garage of 3B Buckhurst Ave and the planting of 2 replacement trees Waterhousia floribunda (Weeping lilly pilly); 2.Demolition of the existing retaining walls around the tree; 3.Construction of a new 150mm kerb and garden bed beyond.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate