NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Armstrong [2015] NSWSC 1510 Hearing dates: 2 October 2015 Decision date: 14 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Continuing detention order for 12 months with an extended supervision order for a period of 3 years commencing from the date the continuing detention order expires Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – high risk sex offender - final hearing under Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – application for continuing detention order for 12 months – application for extended supervision order to follow for 3 years – where defendant has poor history of compliance with requirements of conditional liberty and child protection obligations – where defendant is an untreated sex offender but has recently commenced CUBIT program – adequate supervision not provided under extended supervision order – continuing detention order made for 12 months – risk management concerns largely remain – necessary and appropriate to make an extended supervision order for 3 years Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) s 17(1) Child Protection (Offender Reporting) Act 2004 (Qld) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 61M Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Conway [2011] NSWSC 588 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWSC 1254 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v KAS [2012] NSWSC 1139 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Final) [2011] NSWSC 307 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Matthew Armstrong (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms H Bennett (Plaintiff) Mr P Skinner (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate