NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sergeant John Lawrie v Tameeka Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1513 Hearing dates: 29 October 2014 Date of orders: 16 October 2015 Decision date: 16 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: 1) Appeal allowed in part;
2) Cross-appeal allowed in part;
3) The appeal by Sergeant John Lawrie against the dismissal of the charges in Counts 1, 2, and 8 be upheld;
4) The appeal against the dismissal of the charge in Count 3 be dismissed;
5) The appeal against the dismissal of the charges in relation to Counts 4 and 5 be upheld;
6) The cross-appeal in relation to the conviction of Tameeka Pty Ltd against conviction in relation to Count 7 be upheld;
7) The cross-appeal in relation to the conviction in relation to Count 6 be dismissed;
8) To the extent that the appeal and/or cross-appeal has been upheld, the decision of the learned Magistrate be set aside;
9) The Court will separately hear the parties on the question of costs, if any, and the form of any formal order;
10) Proceedings remitted to the Magistrate in the Local Court of New South Wales to be dealt with in accordance with law. Catchwords: APPEAL – appeal and cross-appeal from Local Court – offences under Liquor Act 2007 – interpretation of licence conditions – meaning of 'nightclub', 'residential premises' and ss 66 and 69 of the Liquor Act 2007 Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Interpretation Act 1987 Liquor Act 1982 Liquor Act 2007 Cases Cited: Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v X [2000] NSWCA 199; (2000) 49 NSWLR 653 Australian Gas Light Company v Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd [1996] HCA 36; (1996) 186 CLR 389 Collector of Customs v Pressure Tankers Pty Ltd and Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 322; (1993) 43 FCR 280 Krishna v DPP (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 318 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 32; (2010) 241 CLR 390 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28: (1998) 194 CLR 345 R v R (1989) 44 A Crim R 404 Williams v The Queen [1986] HCA 88; (1986) 161 CLR 278 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sergeant John Lawrie (Plaintiff/Appellant) Tameeka Pty Ltd (Defendant/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H. El-Hage (Plaintiff/Appellant) T. Lynch (Defendant/Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate