NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Smeaton v Valerius [2015] NSWCATAP 223 Hearing dates: 23 April 2015 Date of orders: 16 October 2015 Decision date: 16 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: P Wass SC, Senior Member T Simon, Senior Member Decision: 1. The appeal is allowed. 2. The matter is remitted for reconsideration on the issue of costs only by a reconstituted Tribunal. Catchwords: Costs, submissions prior to making a decision, fair and equitable, against the weight of evidence, insufficient reasons, procedural fairness, error of law Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Annetts v McCann [1990] HCA 57; (1990) 170 CLR 596 Kioa and Ors v West [1985] HCA 81 Pettit v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376 Papps v Police (2000) 77 SASR 210 Perkins v County Court of Victoria (2000) 2 VR 246 Byrnes v Barry (2004) 150 A Crim R 471 Mountford v. Magistrates Court of South Australia (2006) 95 SASR 103 Keith v Gal [2013] NSWCA 339 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bruce Smeaton – appellant Mary Smeaton – appellant Carl Albion Valerius – respondent Representation: G Casey, solicitor for the appellants M Evans, solicitor for the respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate