NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: YZ v Amazon (No 5) [2015] NSWSC 1539 Hearing dates: 9 October 2015 Date of orders: 09 October 2015 Decision date: 09 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Ruling that the amended statement of claim filed 6 October 2015 was filed in accordance with the court's previous self-executing order of 21 September 2015 and accordingly that the proceedings have not been automatically dismissed. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – pleadings – where previous order allowed amendment "in accordance with" judgment – where failure to comply with such requirement would trigger a self-executing order to dismiss the proceedings – whether amended statement of claim complies with previous order Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: YZ v Amazon (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1130 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: YZ (Plaintiff) Amazon (1st defendant) Smashwords Inc (2nd defendant) OP (3rd defendant) QRS (4th defendant) WX (6th defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff self-represented No appearance for 2nd defendant R Potter (1st, 3rd , 4th and 6th defendants)
Solicitors: Plaintiff self-represented HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (1st defendant) Dwyer Bruce Legal (3rd, 4th and 5th defendants) File Number(s): 2013/178073 Publication restriction: Note: Some of the parties in these proceedings are the subject of pseudonym orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate