NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hardwick v Federal Commissioner of Taxation & Anor [2015] NSWSC 1557 Hearing dates: 21 October 2015 Date of orders: 21 October 2015 Decision date: 21 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) The proceedings be dismissed.
(2) The plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: SUMMARY DISMISSAL – plaintiff prosecuted in Local Court for failing to lodge tax returns – commences proceedings in Supreme Court – alleges s 8C of Taxation Administration Act 1953 unconstitutional – alleges no power to require tax return on "approved form" from plaintiff as information would be provided to child support registrar – jurisdiction – whether Supreme Court can entertain claim that s 8C unconstitutional – whether Court can consider application for writ against Commonwealth officer in relation to prosecution pending in State Court – cross-vesting jurisdiction in relation to writ against federal officer – "special federal matter" – whether "special reasons" for not transferring proceedings to Federal Court – proceedings frivolous and Federal Court should not be burdened – whether constitutional guarantee of freedom of contract – whether s 8C of Taxation Administration Act unconstitutional – whether plaintiff had right to his own approved form of tax return – all claims untenable – proceedings dismissed. Legislation Cited: - Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) - Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth), s 72 - Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – s 162, s 202(ga) - Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – s 38, s 78B - Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth), s 4 - Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) – s 6 - Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – s 8C - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) - 13.4 Cases Cited: - Cole v Whitfield [1988] HCA 18; 165 CLR 360 - Re F; ex parte F [1986] HCA 41; 161 CLR 376 - Hammond v The State of NSW [2013] NSWSC 1930 - Hopkins v Governor General of Australia [2013] NSWCA 365 - Lochner v New York (1905) 198 US 45 - Luton v Lessels [2002] HCA 13; 210 CLR 333 - Phong v Attorney General and Ors [2001] FCA 1241; 114 FCR 75 - R v Whittaker [2015] QCA 116 - Samuels v Readers' Digest Association Pty Ltd [1969] HCA 6; 120 CLR 1 - Simmons v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWCA 405 - Whittaker v Child Support Registrar [2002] FCA 1430 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rodney Charles Hardwick – Plaintiff Federal Commissioner of Taxation – First Defendant Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions – Second Defendant Local Court of New South Wales – Third Defendant Representation: Counsel: In person – Plaintiff C. Lenehan, Ms E. Bathurst – First Defendant A.P.C. McGrath – Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate