NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Frewin v Adecco Industrial Pty Limited [2015] NSWSC 1568 Hearing dates: 12–15 October 2015 Decision date: 23 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: 1. Judgment for Adecco Australia Pty Ltd (the cross-defendant) on the cross-claim brought by CSR Ltd and Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd (the cross-claimants).
2. Unless an application for a different order is made in writing to my Associate within seven days, order the cross-claimants to pay the cross-defendant's costs. Catchwords: CONTRACT – whether contract for indemnity remained in force and binding on parties after expiry of agreement – whether conduct of parties such that they ought be taken to have extended agreement after expiry and ought be bound by terms – whether sufficient evidence to conclude that performance of the arrangement between the parties continued in the same way following expiry of agreement – lack of evidence
CONTRACT – construction of indemnity clause – context to be determined as at date of contract – indemnities to be construed against the indemnified
CONTRACT – power of courts to make informal rectification of documents that contain obvious errors Cases Cited: Andar Transport Pty Ltd v Brambles Ltd [2004] HCA 28; 217 CLR 424 Ankar Pty Ltd v National Reece Westminster Finance (Australia) Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 549 Bofinger v Kingsway Group Ltd [2009] HCA 44; 239 CLR 269 Brambles Ltd v Wail; Brambles Ltd v Andar Transport Pty Ltd [2002] VSCA 150; 5VR 169 Cawsand Pty Ltd v Normans Wines Pty Ltd (Supreme Court (Vic), Brooking J, 21 June 1989, unrep) Chan v Cresdon Pty Ltd (1989) 168 CLR 242 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (1982) 149 CLR 337 Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Australia Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 500 Erect Safe Scaffolding (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sutton [2008] NSWCA 114 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407; 76 NSWLR 603 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo [1997] HCA 22; 191 CLR 559 Optus Networks Pty Ltd v Gilsan (International) Ltd [2006] NSWCA 171 Re CSR Ltd [2003] FCA 82 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphafarm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52; 219 CLR 165 State of New South Wales v Tempo Services Ltd [2004] NSWCA 4 Walton Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher [1988] HCA 7; 164 CLR 387 Texts Cited: Cheshire and Fifoot, Law of Contract (10th Aust. Ed, 2012, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Brian Frewin (Plaintiff) Adecco Industrial Pty Limited (First Defendant) CSR Limited (Second Defendant) Holcim (Australia) Pty Limited (Third Defendant) Adecco Australia Pty Limited (Cross-defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Campbell SC/SJ Longhurst (Plaintiff) D Kelly (First Defendant) HJA Neal (Second & Third Defendants) DA Lloyd (Cross-defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate