NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fryar v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCATOD 117 Hearing dates: 4 and 5 June 2015 Date of orders: 26 October 2015 Decision date: 26 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Y Grant, Senior Member J Chen, Professional Member Z Patel, Professional Member P Hook, Lay Member Decision: The Application is dismissed. The Applicant is to pay costs of the Respondent as agreed and failing agreement at liberty to restore. Catchwords: Pharmacist application for re-registration –onus and evidence necessary to prove appropriate to re-register- Held not satisfied. Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation (National Law) NSW Cases Cited: Ameisen & Medical Council of New South Wales [2015] NSWCAT [OD] 49 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Litchfield v Medical Council of New South Wales [2012] NSW MT 8 Re Mansoor Haider Zaidi [2006] NSW MT 6 Reimers v Medical Council of New South Wales [2015] NSW CAT [OD] 38 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jonathan Fryar (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Angela B Petrie ( Respondent)
Solicitors : J Fryar (Applicant in person) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent ) File Number(s): 1520014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate