NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Aussel and Murphy re McCaffery [2015] NSWCATOD 119 Hearing dates: 21 April 2015 Date of orders: 26 October 2015 Decision date: 26 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: J Wakefield, Senior Member J Pheils, Senior Member M Bolt, General Member Decision: Under s 121(3) of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) No 16a 2014, the Tribunal approves the employment of Nicholas Luke McCaffery being a person who has been convicted of a serious offence as a lay associate within the meaning of s 6 of the Law by Nicholas William Aussel, solicitor, and Thomas Arthur Murphy, solicitor subject to the conditions set out in this decision. Catchwords: Administrative Law – Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NSW) – Occupational Division – Application for approval to be a lay associate – protection of the public – integrity of the legal profession – whether fit and proper – character insight – contrition – rehabilitation –view of the Council of the Law Society -Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) – savings and transitional provisions Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) No 16a Cases Cited: Aussel re McCaffery [2013] NSWADT 102 Briginshaw v Briginshaw 60 CLR 336 Camille Edouard Dezarnaulds and Stephen Wawn v Law Society of New South Wales (unreported Spender AJ dated 27 June 1995) Connolly v Law Society of New South Wales [2000] NSWADT 82 Dawson v Law Society of New South Wales (No 590 of 1988) Double Bay Law Pty Ltd t/a & Legal & Howard Hilton v Council of the Law Society of NSW [2013] NSWADT 182 Hegney v Law Society of New South Wales [2008] NSWADT 150 In the matter of Iverson (unreported 26 July 1996, No 30 of 1995) La Fontaine v Law Society [2006] NSWADT 244 McCowan v Council of the Law Society of NSW [2014] NSWCATOD 44 McGirr & Anor v The Council of the Law Society of NSW [2014] NSWCATOD 154 Michael John Charles Caiger [1993] NSWLST 14 Miedzinski v Council of the Law Society [2007] NSWADT 268 Re Clayton [1962] SR (NSW) 132 Category: Principal judgment Parties: NW Aussel and TA Murphy (Applicants) Representation: Counsel: C Stewart (Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate