NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Community Action for Windsor Bridge Inc v NSW Roads and Maritime Services & anor [2015] NSWLEC 167 Hearing dates: 22, 23 October 2014 Date of orders: 27 October 2015 Decision date: 27 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Brereton AJ Decision: All the grounds for review of the Minister's decision fail. Summons dismissed Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – application for declaration that decision of Minister for Planning and Infrastructure to approve destruction of Windsor Bridge and construction of new bridge invalid – whether decision void for lack of certainty and finality – whether Minister's decision defers determination of material modifications so as not to amount to "approval" – validity on grounds of finality and certainty to be determined by construction of statute vesting decision-making power – approval under (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Pt 5.1 – permissibility of degree of generality – requirement that outer limits of approval are discernible – relevance of complexity and scope of project under approval – whether outer parameters of approval defined – whether Minister failed to take into account relevant considerations – whether cultural heritage was mandatory relevant consideration – whether Minister failed to give proper consideration to cultural heritage – severance of void condition – whether severance of impugned condition, if invalid, would result in approval operating substantially differently – Wednesbury unreasonableness – application of doctrine in planning context – whether inclusion of impugned condition manifestly unreasonable. Legislation Cited: (CTH) Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 75I, s 80, s 115T, s 115U, s 115U(1), s 115U(2), s 115U(3), s 115W, s 115W(1), s 115X(1), s 115X(2), s 115X(3), s 115Y(1), s 115Y(2), s 115Y(3), s 115Y(4), s 115Z(1), s 115Z(3), s 115Z(4), s 115Z(5), s 115Z(6), s 115ZA, s 115ZB, s 115ZB(1), s 115ZB(3), s 115ZI(1), s 115ZI(2), s 115ZJ(2), Pt 4, Pt 5, Pt 5.1 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment (Part 3A Repeal) Act 2011 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, Schedule 2, Parts 3-4 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987, s 32(2) (NSW) State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011, cl 14, Sch 3 cl 1(1) (NSW) State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007, cl 94(1) Cases Cited: Allandale Blue Metal Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services [2013] NSWCA 103; (2013) 195 LGERA 182 Associated Provincial Pictures Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] EWCA Civ 1; [1948] 1 KB 223. Auburn Municipal Council v Szabo (1971) 67 LGRA Barrington - Gloucester - Stroud Preservation Alliance Inc v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure [2012] NSWLEC 197; (2012) 194 LGERA 113 Bat Advocacy NSW Inc v Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts (2011) 180 LGERA 99 Belmorgan Property Development Pty v GPT Re Ltd [2007] NSWCA 171; (2007) 153 LGERA 450 Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163 Buzzacott v Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities [2013] FCAFC 111; (2013) 215 FCR 301 Byron Shire Businesses For The Future Inc v Byron Council [1994] NSWLEC 159 Coffs Harbour City Council v The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure [2012] NSWLEC 4; (2012) 187 LGERA 252 Coffs Harbour City Council v The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure (2011) 184 LGERA 419 Dunsmuir v New Brunswick [2008] 1 SCR 190 Greek Australian Finance Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (1974) 29 LGRA 130 Hubertus Schuetzenverein Liverpool Rifle Club Limited v Commonwealth of Australia [1994] FCA 1161; (1994) 51 FCR 213 Hubertus Schuetzenverein Liverpool Rifle Club Limited v Commonwealth of Australia (1995) 58 FCR 46; (1995) 88 LGERA 297; (1995) 130 ALR 447 Hurstville City Council v Renaldo Plus 3 Pty Limited [2006] NSWCA 248 Kent County Council v Kingsway Investments (Kent) Ltd [1971] AC 72 Khan v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1987) 14 LD 291 Kindimindi Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Council, [2006] NSWCA 23; (2006) 143 LGERA 277 Maitland City Council v Anambah Homes Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 455; (2005) 64 NSWLR 695 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332; 87 ALJR 618 Minister for Planning v Walker (2008) 161 LGERA 423 Mison v Randwick Municipal Council (1991) 23 NSWLR 734 Notaras v Waverly Council [2007] NSWCA 333 Parramatta City Council v Hale (1982) 47 LGRA 319 Parramatta City Council v Shell Company of Australia Limited (1971) 2 NSWLR 632; 27 LGRA 102 Pittwater Council v Minister for Planning [2011] NSWLEC 162; (2011) 184 LGERA 419 Property Development Pty v GPT Re Ltd [2007] NSWCA 171; (2007) 153 LGERA 450 Qantas Airways Ltd v Aravco Ltd (1996) 185 CLR 43 Rivers SOS Inc v Minister for Planning [2009] NSWLEC 213; (2009) 178 LGERA 347 Randwick Municipal Council v Pacific-Seven Pty Ltd (1989) 69 LGRA 13 Scott v Wollongong City Council (1992) 75 LGRA 112 Sloane v McDonald Industries (Sales) Pty Ltd (1989) 17 NSWLR 86 Transport Acton Group against Motorways Inc v Roads and Traffic Authority [1999] NSWCA 196; (1999) 46 NSWLR 598 Ulan Coal Mines Ltd v Minister for Planning [2008] NSWLEC 185; (2008) 160 LGRA 20 Walsh v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 255 Warkworth Mining Ltd v Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association Inc [2014] NSWCA 105; (2014) 200 LGERA 375 Weal v Bathurst City Council [2000] NSWCA 88; (2000) 111 LGERA 181 Wechsler v Auburn Council (1997) 130 LGERA 134 Winn v Director-General of National Parks and Wildlife [2001] NSWCA 17; (2001) 130 LGERA 508 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589 Texts Cited: Casey & Lowe Windsor Bridge Replacement Project Independent Heritage Review, August 2013 Illawarra Regional Environmental Plan No 1 Urban Design and Landscape Concept Report October 2012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Community Action for Windsor Bridge Inc (Applicant) NSW Roads and Maritime Services (1st Respondent) Minister for Planning and Infrastructure (2nd Respondent) Representation: N.J. Williams SC w M.C. Fraser (Applicant) A. Galasso SC w C Norton (1st Respondent) J.K. Kirk SC w Z Heger (2nd Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate