NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Thompson v Chapman [2015] NSWCATAP 233 Hearing dates: 31 August 2015 Date of orders: 28 October 2015 Decision date: 28 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Britton, Principal Member K Rosser, Senior Member Decision: The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL — assessment of quantum meruit Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: Eddy Lau Constructions Pty Ltd v Transdevelopment Enterprise Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 273 Gray (Constructions) Pty Ltd v Hogan [2000] NSWCA 26 Pavey & Matthews v Paul [1987] HCA 5; (1987) 162 CLR 221 Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 Sopov v Kane [No 2] [2009] VSCA 141. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Elizabeth Jane Thompson – appellant Andrew Chapman - respondent Representation: Counsel: P. Bambagiotti (appellant) M. McMahon (respondent)
Solicitors: Makinson d'Apice Lawyers (appellant) Martin Reilly Lawyers (respondent) File Number(s): AP 15/42814 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Commercial and Consumer Division Date of Decision: 16 June 2015 Before: D Goldstein, Senior Member File Number(s): HB 13/46658, HB 13/46596; HB 14/15658
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate