NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Reznitsky v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] NSWCA 338 Hearing dates: 27 October 2015 Decision date: 27 October 2015 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Tobias AJA at [32]; Adamson J at [33] Decision: (1) Summons dismissed.
(2) No order as to costs of the summons. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – application to set aside judgment in District Court – applicant failed to appear on appeal from Local Court – appeal dismissed – application to set aside order dismissing appeal – applicant failed to attend on second day of hearing and failed to proffer evidence in support of application – review sought of order dismissing application to reinstate appeal – whether jurisdictional error – whether reasonable apprehension of bias – whether procedural unfairness – whether failure to give reasons Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 22 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 176 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Director-General, Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care v Lambert (2009) 74 NSWLR 523; [2009] NSWCA 102 Garde v Dowd (2011) 80 NSWLR 620; [2011] NSWCA 115 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323; [2001] HCA 30 Reznitsky v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2014] NSWCA 79 Sasterawan v Morris (2007) NSWLR 547; [2007] NSWCA 185 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Boris Reznitsky (Applicant) District Court of NSW (First Respondent) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant in person Submitting appearance (First Respondent) Ms M England/Ms A Rose (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate