NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v A2; R v KM; R v Vaziri (No. 18) [2015] NSWSC 1625 Hearing dates: 28 October 2015, 30 October 2015 Date of orders: 02 November 2015 Decision date: 02 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: Tendency and coincidence directions to be given with respect to KM and A2 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown seeks tendency and coincidence directions against two accused concerning evidence already before jury - relevant considerations under ss.97, 98 and 101 Evidence Act 1995 - tendency and coincidence directions to be given Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: DSJ v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2012] NSWCCA 9; 215 A Crim R 349 El-Haddad v R [2015] NSWCCA 10; 88 NSWLR 93 R v A2; R v KM; R v Vaziri (No. 9) [2015] NSWSC 1491 R v Gale; R v Duckworth [2012] NSWCCA 174; 217 A Crim R 487 R v MR [2013] NSWCCA 236 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) A2 (Accused) KM (Accused) Shabbir Mohammedbhai Vaziri (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms NL Williams (Crown) Mr RF Sutherland SC (Accused A2 and Vaziri) Mr S Bouveng (Accused KM)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Armstrong Legal (Accused) File Number(s): 2012/280081 (A2)2012/285455 (KM)2012/285639 (Vaziri) Publication restriction: ---
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate