NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Haixing Group Pty Ltd v Mary Ann Chan [2015] NSWSC 1637 Hearing dates: 30 October 2015 Date of orders: 05 November 2015 Decision date: 05 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: No order made for extension of operation of caveat. Leave not granted to lodge further caveat. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – caveats – extension of caveats – caveator a grantee of call option – whether serious question to be tried that option was validly exercised – Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) s74K.
CONTRACTS – construction and interpretation – call option – requirements for valid exercise of option – whether compliance with requirement of delivery of two executed contracts essential for valid exercise of option Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) s 74K Cases Cited: Boreland v Docker [2007] NSWCA 94 Buildev Development Pty Limited v PIC Sales Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 1245 C & P Syndicate Pty Limited v Reddy [2013] NSWSC 643 Comdox No 24 Pty Limited v Robins [2009] NSWSC 367 Kavia Holdings Pty Limited v Suntrack Holdings Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 716 Prudential Assurance Co Limited v Health Minders Pty Limited (1987) 9 NSWLR 673 Spectra Pty Limited v Pindari Pty Limited [1974] 2 NSWLR 617 Tonitto v Bassal (1992) 28 NSWLR 564 Young v Lamb [2001] NSWCA 225 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Haixing Group Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Mary Ann Chan (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Chapple (Plaintiff) Mr M W Young SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate