NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TriCare (Hastings) Limited v Allen [2015] NSWCA 344 Hearing dates: 5 November 2015 Date of orders: 10 November 2015 Decision date: 10 November 2015 Before: Ward JA; Simpson JA; Tobias AJA Decision: 1. Appeal be dismissed as incompetent. 2. Each party to pay its or their own costs. Catchwords: APPEAL –– whether appeal incompetent having regard to s 101(1) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 – appellant did not appeal from judgment or order of primary judge but challenged obiter observations as to construction of s 130A of the Residential Parks Act 1998 (NSW) and sought to clarify or correct order remitting matter to the Tribunal in that respect – appeal dismissed as incompetent Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Residential Parks Act 1998 (NSW), ss 128, 130A Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(1) Cases Cited: Driclad Pty Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1968] HCA 91; (1968) 121 CLR 45 Wang & Liu v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 321 Category: Principal judgment Parties: TriCare (Hastings) Limited (Appellant) Sue Allen (First Respondent) Beryl Anderson (Second Respondent) Kevin Byng (Third Respondent) Lorraine Byng (Fourth Respondent) Phillip Tucker (Fifth Respondent) Judy Tucker (Sixth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Robson SC with Dr S Berveling (Appellant) B Walker SC with Ms M McMahon (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate