Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Kamm (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1654 Hearing dates: 6 November 2015 Date of orders: 06 November 2015 Decision date: 06 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: Consent orders made in terms agreed. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – application for an extension of interim supervision orders – consent orders made in terms agreed Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Kamm [2015] NSWSC 1492 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) William Kamm (aka William Costellia, aka "Little Pebble") Representation: Counsel: Mr G Wright (Plaintiff) Mr D Carroll (Defendant) Solicitors: Crown Solicitor (Plaintiff) SJT Law (Defendant) File Number(s): 2015/277682 Publication restriction: None EX TEMPORE Judgment 1. HER HONOUR: On 13 October RS Hulme J made interim supervision orders under the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) (see State of New South Wales v Kamm [2015] NSWSC 1492). The application for final orders is listed for hearing before the court on 14 and 15 December. 2. Today, the matter comes before the Court in order that an application for an extension of the orders made by RS Hulme J could be pressed. The parties have appeared this morning, asking the Court to make orders in agreed terms, which appear in MFI1. 3. In the circumstances, given what is dealt with in RS Hulme J's October order and what the parties have agreed, I am satisfied that justice demands that the consent orders be made in the terms agreed. 4. Accordingly, for those reasons I make orders in terms of MFI1. ********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 09 November 2015