NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Adoption of AT [2015] NSWSC 1666 Hearing dates: 7-9 April, 20-22 July 2015 Date of orders: 22 July 2015 Decision date: 22 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity - Adoptions List Before: Brereton J Decision: Adoption order made; consent dispense order made. Catchwords: FAMILY LAW AND CHILD WELFARE – child welfare under State legislation – adoption – whether the making of an adoption order is clearly preferable to any other order that could be made with respect to the care of the child – where child settled in placement with proposed adoptive parents and has developed familial and psychological ties with adoptive parents and siblings – whether adoptive mother's depressive illness undermines her parenting capacity – where adoptive parents have experienced difficulty in supporting contact with birth parents – where adoptive parents committed to supporting birth parent contact – where adoptive parents not ideally placed to meet child's cultural needs – where adoptive mother's cultural heritage sufficiently similar to child's to mitigate deficit in child's cultural and identity needs – parenting capacity of birth parents – where realistic prospect of restoration of child to care of birth parents remote – where preserving the possibility of restoration would contravene the spirit of adoption principle (e1) – held, that the making of an adoption order is clearly preferable to any other order that could be made with respect to the care of the child. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Adoption Act 2000, s 8(1), s 8(2), s 23(2), s 24(1), s 28(1), s 28(3), s 28(4), s 67(1), s 90, s 90(3), s 91 (NSW) Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1988, s 44, s 90 Cases Cited: Adoption of NG [2014] NSWSC 680 Adoption of RCC & RZA [2015] NSWSC 813 Adoption of SRB, CJB & RDB [2014] NSWSC 138 Director-General, Department of Community Services v D [2007] NSWSC 762; (2007) 37 Fam LR 595 Re D; Application of A [2006] NSWSC 1056 Texts Cited: Robert Epstein, 'What Makes a Good Parent?' (2010) 21 Scientific American Mind 46 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Secretary, NSW Department of Family and Community Services by its delegate, The Principal Officer Adoption, Barnardos (plaintiff) T (natural mother) C (natural father) Representation: Counsel: S Christie (plaintiff) S Gardiner (natural mother) G Winn (natural father)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate