NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: JM & PM Holdings Pty Ltd v Snap-on Tools (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 347 Hearing dates: 3, 4 November 2015 Decision date: 11 November 2015 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [14]; Emmett AJA at [72] Decision: Appeal dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct – Franchising Code of Conduct – franchise agreement – whether cash flow projection provided prior to entry into the franchise agreement contravened Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 51AD or s 52 – whether any loss or damage suffered by reason of contraventions – no error shown in conclusion of primary judge that no loss or damage suffered by reason of conduct alleged to have been in contravention – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer (Industry Codes – Franchising) Repeal Regulation 2014 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), Pts IVB, V; ss 51AD, 51AE, 52, 82, 87 Trade Practices (Industry Codes – Franchising) Regulations 1998 (Cth), cll 3, 6, 6B; Schedule Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v South East Melbourne Cleaning Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] FCA 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; 250 CLR 640 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60; 218 CLR 592 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 25; 238 CLR 304 Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 39; 247 CLR 486 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Netaf Pty Ltd v Bikane Pty Ltd (1990) 92 ALR 490 Manhattan (Asia) Ltd v Dymocks Franchise Systems (China) Ltd [2014] FCA 1143; 225 FCR 508 Residual Assco Group Ltd v Spalvins [2000] HCA 33; 202 CLR 629 Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JM & PM Holdings Pty Ltd (First Appellant) Paul Morgan (Second Appellant) Snap-on Tools (Australia) Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: DAC Robertson, P Horobin (Appellants) SM Nixon, A Jordan (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate