NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AIN v Medical Council of New South Wales [2015] NSWCATAP 241 Hearing dates: 28 August 2015 Date of orders: 11 November 2015 Decision date: 11 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A P Coleman SC, Senior Member Dr J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: 1. Appeal allowed in part. 2. Order 2 made on 14 April 2015 in proceedings 1330335 in the Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division is set aside insofar as it determines that there is an overriding public interest against disclosure of information in Document 64 and, in substitution for it, the respondent is to provide the applicant with access to the information contained in the following entries and notes in Document 64: the entries for 5 July 2010 and 19 July 2010; the first line of the entry for 24 September 2010 and the second sentence of the entry for 24 September 2010 (comprising the last word on the second line of the entry and the third line of the entry); the entry for 5 and 6 October 2010; the entry of 8 October 2010, other than the last five words of the second line of that entry and the third line of the entry; the note immediately following the entry of 8 October 2010, other than the last six words of the first line and the whole of the second and last lines of that note; the entry for 14 October 2010 other than the last six words of the first line of that entry and lines 2-5 of that entry; and the note following the entry for 14 October 2010. 3. The Tribunal's decision is set aside insofar as it implicitly refuses access to the information in Documents 90, 107, 115 and 168 and, in substitution for that decision, the respondent is to provide the applicant with access to the information contained in Documents 90, 115 and 168 and to the information contained in Document 107 other than the third and fourth paragraphs of that document (that is, the second and third paragraphs after the marginal number "2" which appear immediately before a heading then marginal number "3"). 4. No order as to costs of the Appeal. 5. The appeal is otherwise dismissed. 6. Order pursuant to s 64 (1) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 that there be a restriction on publication of any information that will identify the applicant. Catchwords: GOVERNMENT INFORMATION – Client legal privilege – Whether Tribunal addressed the question of whether disclosure of document would disclose the content of a confidential communication – Whether Tribunal considered whether there was a real prospect of litigation – Whether Tribunal considered whether in-house lawyer had requisite independence when advising in relation to a complaint concerning conduct of the respondent for which she was responsible; GOVERNMENT INFORMATION – Personal information – Whether information of agency officer is personal information – Balancing of public interest considerations; FACT FINDING - Whether the Tribunal made findings of fact required for conclusions as to application of privilege with no evidence to support findings – Whether Tribunal entitled to draw inferences - Whether circumstances gave rise to a reasonable and definite inference – Whether Tribunal entitled to consider evidence in previous proceedings involving same parties; APPEAL – Whether grounds of appeal limited to those identified in notice of appeal – Tribunal's duty to resolve the real issues in the proceedings with as little formality as possible; PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS – Whether Tribunal erred in making a finding that litigation privilege applied when this was not part of respondent's case; COSTS –Appeal on decision not to award costs- special circumstances- whether objective test. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 (NSW) Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aavelaid v J.A. Hayek t/as Laing & Simmons [2015] NSWCATAP 130 AIN v Medical Council of New South Wales [2015] NSWCATAD 66 AIN v Medical Council of NSW [2013] NSWADT 112 Aquila Coal Pty Ltd v Bowen Central Coal Pty Ltd [2013] QSC 82 Australian Hospital Care Pty Ltd & Anor v Duggan & Ors (No 2) [1999] VSC 131 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 CCB v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAD 145 Colefax v Department of Education and Communities [2013] NSWADT 75 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2015] NSWCATOD 112 Fitzpatrick v NSW Office of Liquor and Gaming [2010] NSWADT 72 Flat Glass Industries Ltd v MCS Builders Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 148 Gaynor v Burns [2015] NSWCATAP 150 H M & O Investments Pty Ltd v Ingram (No 1) [2011] NSWSC 550 Hammond v Ozzy Cheapest Cars Pty Ltd t/as Ozzy Car Sales [2015] NSWCATAP 65 Hendrickson v Yarra Bay 16 ft. Skiff Sailing Club Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWADT 204 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 Khan v Kang [2014] NSWCATAP 48 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 390 Lithgow City Council v Jackson (2011) 244 CLR 352 Marshall v Prescott [2015] NSWCA 110 McKinnon v Blacktown City Council [2012] NSWADT 44 Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 120 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 MJ v Department of Education & Commerce [2013] NSWADT 213 MJ v Department of Education and Communities [2014] NSWCATAD 12 Obieta v Australian College of Professionals Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 38 Office of Finance and Services v APV and APW [2014] NSWCATAP 88 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72) Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Re Southland Coal Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 899 Sahade v Owners SP 62022 [2015] NSWCATAP 225 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262 SFGB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 231 Smith v Giro Construction Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 214 Soliman v University of Technology Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146 Special Protection Services (NSW) Pty Limited v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2015] NSWCATOD 112 Starr v Superannuation Administration Corporation [2015] NSWCATAD 76 State of New South Wales v Jackson [2007] NSWCA 279 TB v New South Wales [2015] NSWSC 575 Tebbutt v Minister for Lands and Water [2015] NSWCATAD 95 Warren v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWCATAP 20 White v Carlton Tow Bars Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 8 Wu Shan Liang v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1995) 57 FCR 432 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AIN (Appellant) Medical Council of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Brennan (Appellant) J Davidson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate