NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: AB v Curry & Anor (No. 3) [2015] NSWSC 1677 Hearing dates: 23 October 2015 Decision date: 23 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [34] of judgment. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – suppression and non-publication orders – redaction of Court's published reasons for decision – identification of complainant in sexual abuse offence proceedings – plaintiff had adduced evidence relating to her physical and sexual abuse while in foster care in support of her family provision application – no suppression or non-publication orders were sought at trial – plaintiff sought removal or redaction of Court's reasons after they had been published – reasons identified the plaintiff and the circumstances surrounding her foster care, but not the alleged offender – where police are investigating the plaintiff's allegations of abuse, but no criminal proceedings have been commenced – where defendants' counsel published a copy of the Court's reasons on his website – whether it is necessary to remove or redact the Court's reasons in order to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice – consideration of principles of open justice – consideration of the policy underlying s 578A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) in relation to publication of information identifying complainants in sexual abuse offence proceedings – held, allowing the application in part and ordering the removal of the Court's reasons and their replacement with redacted reasons, that while s 578A does not apply, the policy underlying that section informs what is necessary for the proper administration of justice Legislation Cited: Children (Care and Protection) Act 1987 (NSW) Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Royal Commissions Act 1923 (NSW) Cases Cited: D1 v P1 (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 440 John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Police Tribunal (NSW) (1986) 5 NSWLR 465 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v District Court of New South Wales [2004] NSWCA 324; (2004) 61 NSWLR 344 Rinehart v Welker [2011] NSWCA 403 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: AB (Plaintiff) Aileen Esme Curry (1st Defendant) Juliet Anna Greentree (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In person via telelink L Clarke (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate