NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Glover v R; Stuart v R [2015] NSWCCA 285 Hearing dates: 9 July 2015 Decision date: 13 November 2015 Before: Basten JA at [1]; McCallum J at [95]; R A Hulme J at [105] Decision: In relation to Laurence Glover (2011/294019):
(1) Leave to appeal against conviction granted. (2) Appeal against conviction dismissed.
In relation to Nathan Thomas Stuart (2011/294024):
(1) Leave to appeal against conviction granted. (2) Appeal against conviction dismissed. (3) Direct the Registrar to relist the application for leave to appeal against sentence. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – whether verdicts unreasonable and not supported by evidence – three accused convicted for multiple armed robberies at clubs and hotels – prosecution case circumstantial – coincidence evidence relying on common elements between last robbery where strong evidence against the accused available and the earlier robberies – whether inference linking the accused to earlier robberies properly available
EVIDENCE – coincidence evidence – rejection of pre-trial application for separate trials not challenged – no pre-trial ruling on admissibility of coincidence evidence – evidence of commonalities between number of armed robberies led at joint trial – once all of the evidence had been given trial judge allowed prosecution to argue coincidence – no objection taken to jury directions – whether properly admitted – whether challenge available on appeal – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 98, 101 Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 97, 98, 101, 184 Cases Cited: Carr v R [2015] NSWCCA 186 Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; [1984] HCA 7 Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590 Hawi v R [2014] NSWCCA 83 Hoch v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 292 Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Morris v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454; [1987] HCA 50 R v Ellis (2003) 58 NSWLR 700; [2003] NSWCCA 319 R v Fletcher [2005] NSWCCA 338; 156A Crim R 308 Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510; [1974] HCA 35 Wood v R [2012] NSWCCA 21 Category: Principal judgment Parties: In matter 2011/294019: Laurence Glover (Applicant) The Queen (Director of Public Prosecutions) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate