NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Strbac [2015] NSWDC 268 Hearing dates: 24 July 2015; 31 July 2015; 7 August 2015 Decision date: 07 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: Offender referred for assessment as to his suitability for intensive correction in the community under s 69(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – particular offence – cultivate commercial quantity of a prohibited plant – sophisticated cannabis plantation – cash crop – significant quantity but less serious than other examples of same offence – circumstances of offender – traumatic upbringing – depression following injury – causal connection between addiction and offending – good prospects of rehabilitation – remorse expressed – no prior convictions – plea of guilty at earliest available opportunity – 25% discount – no sentence other than imprisonment appropriate – whether sentence should be two years or less – referral for assessment for intensive correction order – Form 1 for offence of using electricity without authority taken into account Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 69(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 23(2)(a) Electricity Supply Act 1995 (NSW), s 64 Cases Cited: R v Godden [2005] NSWCCA 160 R v Heffernan [2014] NSWDC 302 R v Nguyen [2007] NSWCCA 94 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Stevan Strbac (Offender) Representation: Counsel: L C Hutchinson (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate