NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chel v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2015] NSWSC 1707 Hearing dates: 16 November 2015 Decision date: 16 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: 1. Dismiss the plaintiff's notice of motion filed 16 November 2015.
2. Order that these proceedings will be tried by judge alone and not by jury.
3. Reserve costs. Catchwords: DEFAMATION – notice of election for trial by jury – substantive right vests or accrues upon filing of notice of election – whether vested and accrued right can be waived unilaterally by party to whom right accrued – Kencian v Watney [2015] QCA 212 followed – right can be waived – party who wishes to preserve right to trial by jury in defamation action must serve notice of intention and notice of election irrespective of whether other party does so
DEFAMATION – whether plaintiff entitled to trial by jury having failed to serve notice of election in accordance with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 29.2A – no power to permit election for trial by jury where non-compliance with Defamation Act 2005 and relevant rules – Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 110 followed
ESTOPPEL – Waltons v Maher estoppel - whether defendants estopped from withdrawing election for trial by jury – whether reliance by plaintiff on defendants' election for trial by jury was reasonable – whether defendants' conduct in waiving right to trial by jury unconscionable – elements of estoppel not established Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s 21 Jury Act 1977 (NSW), s 72 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 85 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 29.2A Cases Cited: Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 110 Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells [2011] NSWCA 246; 81 NSWLR 315 Esber v Commonwealth [1992] HCA 20 174 CLR 430 O'Connor v SP Bray Limited (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 248 Kencian v Watney [2015] QCA 212 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Limited v Maher (1988) 164 CLR at 387 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Lili Chel (Plaintiff) Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (First Defendant) Vanda Carson (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Rasmussen (Plaintiff) T Blackburn SC/L Barnett (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate