NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wong v Wong [2015] NSWDC 274 Hearing dates: 30 June 2015; 1, 29 and 30 July 2015 Date of orders: 30 September 2015 Decision date: 30 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff. (2) Liberty to the parties to bring in short minutes of order reflecting the mathematically agreed judgment sum and interest. (3) Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs. (4) Liberty to apply in relation to costs. (5) Exhibits retained for 28 days. Catchwords: TORT - assault and battery - plaintiff claims to have been assaulted by his employer's ex-husband while watering her garden - whether assault occurred as described - expert evidence as to the manner of injury - quantum Cases Cited: Blacktown City Council v Hocking [2008] NSWCA 144 Bradley v Matloob [2015] NSWCA 239 Brown v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Fontin v Katapodis (1962) 108 CLR 177 Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (2014) 311 ALR 494 Metaxoulis v McDonalds Australia Ltd [2015] NSWCA 95 New South Wales v Moss (2000) 54 NSWLR 536 Reece v Reece (1994) 19 MVR 103 Sampco Pty Ltd v Wurth [2015] NSWCA 117 Vines v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2007] NSWCA 75 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Georges Kam Wong Defendant: Zak Lung Martin Wong Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr D Stretton Defendant: Mr F Austin
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate