Chel v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1726
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chel v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1726
Hearing dates: 16 November 2015
Decision date: 16 November 2015
Jurisdiction: Common Law
Before: Adamson J
Decision: Decline the plaintiff's application for an adjournment
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for adjournment of hearing pending the convening of a Court of Appeal – application refused - no question of principle
Category: Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Lili Chel (Plaintiff)
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (First Defendant)
Vanda Carson (Second Defendant)
Representation: Counsel:
R Rasmussen (Plaintiff)
T Blackburn SC/L Barnett (Defendants)
Solicitors:
Beazley Boorman Lawyers (Plaintiff)
Banki Haddock Fiora Lawyers (Defendants)
File Number(s): 2011/409423
Judgment (EX TEMPORE – REVISED)
1. The plaintiff has applied for an adjournment of these proceedings until 10 o'clock on Wednesday, 18 November 2015.
2. The plaintiff has this afternoon approached Macfarlan JA, for the Court of Appeal to be convened to consider whether leave to appeal against my decision made today to refuse the plaintiff's application for trial by jury ought be granted.
3. Mr Rasmussen submitted that the reason Macfarlan JA could not give a decision until 3pm tomorrow is because of a personal commitment and that tomorrow could be usefully employed by the parties in narrowing the issues and, to use his expression, "getting the plaintiff's house in order", in order that the plaintiff could, once again to quote his words, "kick off on Wednesday morning at 10 o'clock".
4. These proceedings were allocated a hearing date in April of this year. But for Mr Rasmussen's indisposition they would have begun on 9 November 2015. I would have thought that if the plaintiff's house were ever to be in order it would be in order by now.
5. Accordingly I decline the plaintiff's application for an adjournment and note that the Court of Appeal did not grant a stay this afternoon, although one was sought on behalf of the plaintiff.
6. As it is now 4.45pm, I will adjourn the Court until 10 o'clock in the morning at which time I would expect the plaintiff's case to be conducted as expeditiously as possible.
Order
1. I make the following order:
1. Decline the plaintiff's application for an adjournment.
***************
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Decision last updated: 19 November 2015
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.